Skip to content
LEXUNCreate your KeyRun a decision free
For finance teams

One evidence trail from proposal to outcome.

The ledger records what the business spent. It rarely preserves why it decided to: which assumptions were used, what downside was considered, who approved it and whether the assumptions held. LEXUN keeps that record beside the ledger — scenarios compared on the same seed, the downside written down, approval frozen with the forecast, and the outcome scored when reality answers.

The proposals it tests

Can we afford this hire, this quarter?

The cost level that breaks the runway, and the probability cash stays positive with the hire in.

business runway model
Buy the machine now, lease it, or wait?

Three alternatives on the same model, horizon and seed, each with its own band, downside and breakpoint — frozen with the decision.

compared alternatives
Can we survive a revenue decline?

Revenue stepped down, costs held: the months of cash in the worst tenth of paths and the assumption that decides them.

business runway model
Should we open another location?

Fit-out cash out, a ramp declared as an assumption with an owner and a review date, the breakpoint the ramp must clear.

business runway model
Can we take on this facility?

Repayments as a cost line; the growth the facility needs to be safe, named by the model.

sensitivity and breakpoints
What would change this decision?

Every result names the smallest change in each driver that moves the published band, so the review meeting knows what to watch.

what would change my mind

One proposal, worked

If we buy the machine now, does the business keep positive cash for the next 12 months?

A £120,000 machine. £260,000 in the bank becomes £140,000 the day after the purchase; running costs rise £1,500 a month to £88,500 against £85,000 of revenue growing 2% a month. Illustrative figures; the shipped engine’s arithmetic, at a fixed seed — and the same model compares leasing or waiting on the same seed.

Probability the business keeps positive cash to month 12

80–90%

probably safe, watch it — a range, never a point, because the inputs are uncertain and the model says so.

Downside
Under the stress case (Revenue −25%, growth −2pt, volatility +5pt) survival falls to 20%. That is the number to plan around, not the headline.
Breakpoint
The median path reaches the horizon at or above -1.1%/month revenue growth; you stated 2%.
Biggest lever
Monthly revenue moves the answer most; a stressed month there swings survival by about 54 points.
Cash runway
In the worst tenth of paths the cash lasts 9 months; in the best tenth, 12+.
The test reality applies
On the review date, was the business cash balance greater than £0 (no insolvency event, no emergency rescue funding required)?

The figures · cash £140,000 · revenue £85,000 a month · costs £88,500 a month · growth 2% a month · volatility 10% · horizon 12 months. Each is labelled a fact or an assumption before the engine runs.

5,000 paths · runway@1.0.2 · seed 564 · receipt rw_2357c66f_234 · reproduce this exact result · run it on your own figures

What the board gets

The workflow, from proposal to outcome

1 · Frame

One question with a checkable outcome and a date it resolves on.

LIVE
2 · Evidence

Every figure a fact or an assumption, with its source, date and owner.

LIVE
3 · Run

5,000 seeded paths: the band, the downside, the breakpoint, the lever.

LIVE
4 · Challenge

The case against, the assumptions it leans on, and what would change the answer.

LIVE
5 · Record

Recommendation, approval and success criterion frozen and sealed under one hash.

LIVE PILOT
6 · Review

Reminders for the review date; the outcome scored against the frozen criterion.

LIVE

Live means on one person’s device today, free. Reviews and approvals across a team are facilitated by LEXUN during the founding pilot; the self-serve shared workspace is planned for Release 2 and labelled so on every page that mentions it.

Software and people, stated plainly. The engine, the classification, the scenarios, the frozen receipt and the outcome scoring are software you can inspect on this site today, on one device. Reviews and approvals across a team are facilitated by LEXUN during the founding pilot and written into the record; the self-serve shared workspace with roles and an organisation audit log is Release 2, and every page that mentions it says planned.

Why the board can trust it

Reproducible

Same figures, same seed, same answer, on any machine. Every result carries its receipt; anyone can check it.

Private by architecture

The engine runs in the browser. Client figures are not uploaded; the optional Copilot is the one exception and says so before you use it.

Test-gated, not accuracy-claimed

862 automated checks prove the software behaves as written. No accuracy percentage is published until ten outcomes have resolved in a domain.

Scored in public

LEXUN’s own forecasts are frozen and graded on the public register, misses included.

The detail, and the limits, are in the Trust Centre and the Accuracy Centre.

How it is priced

Free
£0

The full engine, unlimited runs, no card and no account. Saving needs a free LEXUN Key.

Pro
£9 a month

or £79 a year: every decision kept, exports and the PDF record. Checkout opens when Stripe is switched on.

Organisation seat
£49 a seat a month

or £490 a year, ex VAT: Pro for every seat plus the board report and the audit-trail export.

Founding pilot
£1,500

30 days, one real decision, with a person. Credited against the first four annual seats.

All of it on one page, with every line labelled: pricing.

Questions finance teams ask

Where does our data go?

The engine runs in the browser and saved decisions are encrypted on the device; nothing is uploaded. Forms and the optional Copilot are the two network components, described on the security page with the processors named. The procurement pack has the architecture, data flows, subprocessors and known limitations.

Can several of us work on one decision?

Not in the software yet. Today one person runs the decision on one device and exports the record; during the founding pilot LEXUN facilitates the review and approval with your team and writes it into the record. Shared workspaces, roles and approvals are planned for Release 2.

What does the board actually receive?

The Decision Record as a paper a board can read — question, assumptions, band, downside, sensitivity, breakpoint, scenarios, challenge, conditions, evidence, model version, receipt, success criterion and review date. The sample is generated from the engine on fictional data.

Is there a contractual SLA, SSO or a private deployment?

Not today, and none is claimed. Enterprise agreements are priced after a pilot; SSO, SCIM and private deployment are planned or by agreement once implemented and tested, and are labelled so on the entitlement matrix.