Skip to content
LEXUNGet your KeyRun a simulation
Sample board report · DEMONSTRATION DATA — fictional company

Decision Record NSK-2026-005 — Open a Manchester showroom

Northstar Kitchens Ltd, board meeting of 21 July 2026. Prepared from the frozen Decision Record; every figure is a real output of runway@1.0.0 at seed 2202. Northstar Kitchens Ltd does not exist.

Download as PDF Open the record in the demonstration workspace

Board paper · for decision

If Northstar opens a Manchester showroom in September 2026 — £85,000 fit-out and £14,500 a month of additional running cost — will group cash remain above £0 for 12 months?

Expected case45–55% GENUINELY UNCERTAIN
Recommendation put to the boardSign the Deansgate lease and the fixed-price fit-out contract; open September 2026
Financial exposure£259,000 — £85,000 fit-out plus 12 months of additional running cost
Outcome measurable on21 July 2027
Decision ownerPriya Nair, Finance Director
Independent challengerElena Marsh, Fractional CFO (external)
ApproverTom Whitfield, Managing Director
Record stateMonitoring · frozen 21 July 2026

1. The decision in one paragraph

Northstar proposes a second showroom on Deansgate, Manchester: an £85,000 fixed-price fit-out in month one and £14,500 a month of additional running cost (rent, service charge, rates and two staff). On the facts in the June management accounts and the 1 July bank balance, with revenue growth and volatility declared as assumptions, the engine puts the probability that group cash stays above £0 for the next twelve months at 45–55% if the showroom is opened and no sales from it are counted, against 60–70% if it is not opened. If Manchester ramps as Leeds did in its first year, the band recovers to 55–65% — but that ramp is an assumption, and the record treats it as one.

2. Evidence: what was known, and what was assumed

Each input is classified as a fact (a document the organisation holds) or an assumption (a belief with an owner and an expiry). The engine prices the difference: 3 of the 5 core evidence inputs are facts (horizon and optional fields not counted); 2 are assumptions.

ItemSourceKindReliabilityApplicable periodVerificationVersion
E1 Fit-out quotation
Fixed price replaced the estimate; the estimate is retained as v1.
Contractor quote (Ridley Interiors), fixed priceFactHigh — fixed priceValid 90 daysVerifiedv2 (supersedes E1 v1 (indicative estimate £70,000–£95,000))
E2 Heads of terms — Deansgate unit
Rent, service charge and rates = £9,100/month; two staff = £5,400/month
Landlord's agentFactHigh5-year lease, break at 24 monthsVerifiedv1
E3 Leeds showroom, first-year revenue
Basis for the +£22,000/month from month 5 assumption
Management accounts 2023/24AssumptionMedium — one comparatorApr 2023–Mar 2024Verifiedv1
E4 June 2026 management accountsXero export, reviewed by Hartley & CoFactHighApr–Jun 2026Verifiedv1
E5 Bank balance, 1 July 2026Barclays business account statementFactHighPoint in timeVerifiedv1
Facts entered
cashToday £310,000 · monthlyRevenue £210,000 · monthlyCosts £210,500 (including the £14,500 showroom cost) · horizon 12 months
Assumptions entered
revenue growth 0.8% a month · revenue volatility 18% a month · cost growth 0.3% a month · committed: −£85,000 in month 1

3. Scenarios compared

Same model, same seed (2202), so the only differences between rows are the inputs. The expected row is what the board is asked to approve; moving a scenario never changes it.

ScenarioInputs changedProbability bandEnd cash p10 / p50 / p90BreakpointMost sensitiveReceipt
Do nothingNo showroom; costs unchanged60–70%
PROBABLY SAFE, WATCH IT · +13 pts vs expected
−£60,925 / £371,650 / £1,982,582-1.4%/moMonthly costsrw_a0fb0410_89a
Expected (open, no uplift)Fit-out −£85,000 in month 1; costs +£14,500 a month45–55%
GENUINELY UNCERTAIN
−£69,361 / £58,803 / £1,649,1980.7%/moMonthly costsrw_28504f0f_89a
Expected with showroom sales
assumption-backed
As expected, plus +£22,000 a month from month 5 modelled as committed inflows55–65%
GENUINELY UNCERTAIN · +7 pts vs expected
−£58,598 / £248,722 / £1,811,640-0.7%/moMonthly costsrw_b4cc868a_89a
DownsideRevenue −10%, growth −1pt30–40%
AT RISK · -18 pts vs expected
−£80,901 / −£16,735 / £1,029,9812.4%/moMonthly costsrw_f43d866f_89a
Severe downsideRevenue −25%, growth −2pt, volatility +5pt10–20%
AT RISK · -36 pts vs expected
−£100,044 / −£34,756 / £427,7607.9%/moMonthly costsrw_e858c6f0_89a
UpsideRevenue +10%, growth +1pt65–75%
PROBABLY SAFE, WATCH IT · +16 pts vs expected
−£54,548 / £532,909 / £2,366,743-0.7%/moMonthly costsrw_5d1b3800_89a
Delay to January 2027Three months of net burn before the horizon starts45–55%
GENUINELY UNCERTAIN · +0 pts vs expected
−£69,471 / £57,303 / £1,635,4970.7%/moMonthly costsrw_181ff7c3_89a

4. What moves the answer

Sensitivity (one input at a time, same seed)

InputSwing in survival probability
Monthly costs±46 pts
Monthly revenue±42 pts
Revenue growth±22 pts
Revenue volatility±13 pts
Cash today±7 pts

Breakpoint and margin

The expected case is a 50/50 proposition at 0.7% monthly revenue growth; the stated assumption is 0.8%. Your result moves most with: monthly costs.

Cost of a three-month delay: negligible in cash terms, because the business is cash-generative; the real cost of delay is the landlord’s offer, which lapses in October, and the lost autumn season.

The single most valuable evidence to add: 3 months of actual bank-statement revenue and cost figures (turns assumptions into facts and tightens the band).

5. The independent challenge

Challenger: Elena Marsh, Fractional CFO (external), 10 July 2026. Conclusion: Proceed only if the lease break at 24 months is retained and the fit-out is fixed price

Strongest case against
A second showroom doubles fixed cost in a business whose revenue volatility is 18% a month. The expected case without uplift keeps positive cash, but the end-cash median falls sharply, which removes the buffer that absorbs a bad quarter. If Manchester ramps like Leeds did the decision is comfortable; if it ramps at half the rate the business is running near its floor by spring.
Missing evidence
No Manchester-specific demand evidence; the Leeds comparator is one showroom in one year.
Optimistic assumptions
Ramp to £22,000 a month by month 5; No cannibalisation of Leeds enquiries
Downside
Severe downside scenario materially reduces the survival probability — see Scenario Lab.
Model disagreement
Heuristic cross-check 3 points below the Monte Carlo — not material.
Reversibility
Low for 24 months (lease); fit-out is sunk.
Cost of delay
Moderate — the landlord's offer lapses in October; a January opening loses the autumn season.
Early warning signals
Manchester enquiries below 40 a month by month 3; Group cash below £220,000 at any month end
Conditions that should stop the decision
Fit-out quote not fixed; Lease break removed

6. Review and approval record

ReviewerDateOutcomeCommentConflict of interest
Daniel Okafor, Operations Director15 July 2026Reviewed — no objectionTwo installation teams can cover Greater Manchester from Leeds until month 6.None declared
Sarah Quinn, Adviser, Hartley & Co Accountants (external)16 July 2026Reviewed with a noteRates relief assumption should be confirmed with the council.Adviser to the company; declared
Approval
Approved by Tom Whitfield, Managing Director on 21 July 2026
Conditions
Lease break at 24 months retained; Fit-out contract fixed price, signed before works
Sequence
Sequential — reviews before approval
Conflict of interest
None declared

The approval records the organisation’s decision about the evidence available on 21 July 2026. It does not alter the forecast: the band approved is the band above.

7. The frozen record

Sealed
21 July 2026 by Priya Nair, Finance Director · version 1
Record hash (SHA-256)
774dd1311369e2a2fe8abe8206328e7fa05aab1cd5d7aef8318a00e08cb2a038
Engine receipt
rw_28504f0f_89a — runway@1.0.0 on core 1.1.0, seed 2202, 5,000 paths, input hash 28504f0f
Data version
Management accounts Jun-2026; bank 2026-07-01; quote Ridley v2
Action selected
Sign the Deansgate lease and the fixed-price fit-out contract; open September 2026
Success criterion
Group cash balance above £0 at every month end to 21 July 2027, with no emergency funding
Named resolution source
Northstar bank statements and management accounts, reviewed by Hartley & Co
Resolution date
21 July 2027

Sealed fields: id, question, inputs, classifications, evidence, model, dataVersion, seed, probability, band, confidence, scenarioSelected, challenge, reviews, approval, action, successCriterion, resolutionSource, resolutionDate, engineReceipt. A correction creates version 2 naming version 1 as superseded; nothing in a frozen record is edited in place. Anyone holding the inputs and the seed can reproduce the engine receipt at lexun.co.uk/verify.

8. Monitoring plan

AssumptionExpected rangeCurrentWarning / criticalOwnerFrequencyValid untilStatus
Manchester ramp£22,000/mo by month 5Opened 12 Sep — no data yetbelow £14,000/mo at month 5 / below £8,000/mo at month 5Daniel OkaforMonthly12 February 2027Not yet due
Additional running cost£13,800 to £15,200/mo£14,500/moabove £15,200 / above £16,500Priya NairMonthly21 July 2027Within range
Leeds enquiries (cannibalisation)90 to 120/mo96/mobelow 85/mo / below 70/moDaniel OkaforMonthly31 March 2027Within range

Checkpoints: 21 October 2026 (first), then quarterly to the resolution date. At 21 July 2027 the owner is asked for the bank statements and management accounts named above; reality is compared with the frozen criterion; the outcome is recorded write-once; the forecast is Brier-scored against a naive baseline; and why reality differed is written in words — including which assumption mattered.

9. Decision timeline

DateStateWhoNote
20 June 2026DraftPriya NairFramed after the board asked for a second showroom option
20 June 2026Evidence requiredPriya NairNeeds landlord heads of terms, fit-out quote, Leeds showroom revenue history
2 July 2026Ready for analysisPriya NairFit-out quote and heads of terms received; facts verified
3 July 2026AnalysedPriya NairExpected case, uplift case and five scenarios at seed 2202
10 July 2026ChallengedElena MarshChallenge filed — ramp assumption and lease break flagged
15 July 2026In reviewDaniel OkaforInstallations capacity for a second region reviewed
21 July 2026ApprovedTom WhitfieldApproved with two conditions
21 July 2026FrozenPriya NairRecord sealed; outcome due 21 July 2027
21 July 2026MonitoringsystemAssumption monitor armed; first checkpoint 21 October 2026

10. Boundaries

This paper is decision intelligence, not financial, legal, tax or investment advice. The probability band is a statement about a released model on stated inputs; its known weaknesses are published: revenue follows a log-normal multiplicative step about the stated growth rate, costs grow at a fixed rate, committed amounts are exact, there is no seasonality and no correlation between revenue and cost shocks, and a sales ramp is modelled as fixed committed inflows. No accuracy percentage is claimed for the model until ten outcomes have resolved in its domain. Northstar Kitchens Ltd is a fictional company created to demonstrate the record; no real customer, person or forecast appears in this paper.

Generated from demonstration data by LEXUN · lexun.co.uk/board-report · CA Capital Limited, company number 10848369.