Decision Record NSK-2026-005 — Open a Manchester showroom
Northstar Kitchens Ltd, board meeting of 21 July 2026. Prepared from the frozen Decision Record; every figure is a real output of runway@1.0.0 at seed 2202. Northstar Kitchens Ltd does not exist.
Download as PDF Open the record in the demonstration workspace
If Northstar opens a Manchester showroom in September 2026 — £85,000 fit-out and £14,500 a month of additional running cost — will group cash remain above £0 for 12 months?
1. The decision in one paragraph
Northstar proposes a second showroom on Deansgate, Manchester: an £85,000 fixed-price fit-out in month one and £14,500 a month of additional running cost (rent, service charge, rates and two staff). On the facts in the June management accounts and the 1 July bank balance, with revenue growth and volatility declared as assumptions, the engine puts the probability that group cash stays above £0 for the next twelve months at 45–55% if the showroom is opened and no sales from it are counted, against 60–70% if it is not opened. If Manchester ramps as Leeds did in its first year, the band recovers to 55–65% — but that ramp is an assumption, and the record treats it as one.
2. Evidence: what was known, and what was assumed
Each input is classified as a fact (a document the organisation holds) or an assumption (a belief with an owner and an expiry). The engine prices the difference: 3 of the 5 core evidence inputs are facts (horizon and optional fields not counted); 2 are assumptions.
| Item | Source | Kind | Reliability | Applicable period | Verification | Version |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 Fit-out quotation Fixed price replaced the estimate; the estimate is retained as v1. | Contractor quote (Ridley Interiors), fixed price | Fact | High — fixed price | Valid 90 days | Verified | v2 (supersedes E1 v1 (indicative estimate £70,000–£95,000)) |
| E2 Heads of terms — Deansgate unit Rent, service charge and rates = £9,100/month; two staff = £5,400/month | Landlord's agent | Fact | High | 5-year lease, break at 24 months | Verified | v1 |
| E3 Leeds showroom, first-year revenue Basis for the +£22,000/month from month 5 assumption | Management accounts 2023/24 | Assumption | Medium — one comparator | Apr 2023–Mar 2024 | Verified | v1 |
| E4 June 2026 management accounts | Xero export, reviewed by Hartley & Co | Fact | High | Apr–Jun 2026 | Verified | v1 |
| E5 Bank balance, 1 July 2026 | Barclays business account statement | Fact | High | Point in time | Verified | v1 |
- Facts entered
cashToday £310,000·monthlyRevenue £210,000·monthlyCosts £210,500(including the £14,500 showroom cost) ·horizon 12 months- Assumptions entered
- revenue growth 0.8% a month · revenue volatility 18% a month · cost growth 0.3% a month · committed: −£85,000 in month 1
3. Scenarios compared
Same model, same seed (2202), so the only differences between rows are the inputs. The expected row is what the board is asked to approve; moving a scenario never changes it.
| Scenario | Inputs changed | Probability band | End cash p10 / p50 / p90 | Breakpoint | Most sensitive | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Do nothing | No showroom; costs unchanged | 60–70% PROBABLY SAFE, WATCH IT · +13 pts vs expected | −£60,925 / £371,650 / £1,982,582 | -1.4%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_a0fb0410_89a |
| Expected (open, no uplift) | Fit-out −£85,000 in month 1; costs +£14,500 a month | 45–55% GENUINELY UNCERTAIN | −£69,361 / £58,803 / £1,649,198 | 0.7%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_28504f0f_89a |
| Expected with showroom sales assumption-backed | As expected, plus +£22,000 a month from month 5 modelled as committed inflows | 55–65% GENUINELY UNCERTAIN · +7 pts vs expected | −£58,598 / £248,722 / £1,811,640 | -0.7%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_b4cc868a_89a |
| Downside | Revenue −10%, growth −1pt | 30–40% AT RISK · -18 pts vs expected | −£80,901 / −£16,735 / £1,029,981 | 2.4%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_f43d866f_89a |
| Severe downside | Revenue −25%, growth −2pt, volatility +5pt | 10–20% AT RISK · -36 pts vs expected | −£100,044 / −£34,756 / £427,760 | 7.9%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_e858c6f0_89a |
| Upside | Revenue +10%, growth +1pt | 65–75% PROBABLY SAFE, WATCH IT · +16 pts vs expected | −£54,548 / £532,909 / £2,366,743 | -0.7%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_5d1b3800_89a |
| Delay to January 2027 | Three months of net burn before the horizon starts | 45–55% GENUINELY UNCERTAIN · +0 pts vs expected | −£69,471 / £57,303 / £1,635,497 | 0.7%/mo | Monthly costs | rw_181ff7c3_89a |
4. What moves the answer
Sensitivity (one input at a time, same seed)
| Input | Swing in survival probability |
|---|---|
| Monthly costs | ±46 pts |
| Monthly revenue | ±42 pts |
| Revenue growth | ±22 pts |
| Revenue volatility | ±13 pts |
| Cash today | ±7 pts |
Breakpoint and margin
The expected case is a 50/50 proposition at 0.7% monthly revenue growth; the stated assumption is 0.8%. Your result moves most with: monthly costs.
Cost of a three-month delay: negligible in cash terms, because the business is cash-generative; the real cost of delay is the landlord’s offer, which lapses in October, and the lost autumn season.
The single most valuable evidence to add: 3 months of actual bank-statement revenue and cost figures (turns assumptions into facts and tightens the band).
5. The independent challenge
Challenger: Elena Marsh, Fractional CFO (external), 10 July 2026. Conclusion: Proceed only if the lease break at 24 months is retained and the fit-out is fixed price
- Strongest case against
- A second showroom doubles fixed cost in a business whose revenue volatility is 18% a month. The expected case without uplift keeps positive cash, but the end-cash median falls sharply, which removes the buffer that absorbs a bad quarter. If Manchester ramps like Leeds did the decision is comfortable; if it ramps at half the rate the business is running near its floor by spring.
- Missing evidence
- No Manchester-specific demand evidence; the Leeds comparator is one showroom in one year.
- Optimistic assumptions
- Ramp to £22,000 a month by month 5; No cannibalisation of Leeds enquiries
- Downside
- Severe downside scenario materially reduces the survival probability — see Scenario Lab.
- Model disagreement
- Heuristic cross-check 3 points below the Monte Carlo — not material.
- Reversibility
- Low for 24 months (lease); fit-out is sunk.
- Cost of delay
- Moderate — the landlord's offer lapses in October; a January opening loses the autumn season.
- Early warning signals
- Manchester enquiries below 40 a month by month 3; Group cash below £220,000 at any month end
- Conditions that should stop the decision
- Fit-out quote not fixed; Lease break removed
6. Review and approval record
| Reviewer | Date | Outcome | Comment | Conflict of interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Okafor, Operations Director | 15 July 2026 | Reviewed — no objection | Two installation teams can cover Greater Manchester from Leeds until month 6. | None declared |
| Sarah Quinn, Adviser, Hartley & Co Accountants (external) | 16 July 2026 | Reviewed with a note | Rates relief assumption should be confirmed with the council. | Adviser to the company; declared |
- Approval
- Approved by Tom Whitfield, Managing Director on 21 July 2026
- Conditions
- Lease break at 24 months retained; Fit-out contract fixed price, signed before works
- Sequence
- Sequential — reviews before approval
- Conflict of interest
- None declared
The approval records the organisation’s decision about the evidence available on 21 July 2026. It does not alter the forecast: the band approved is the band above.
7. The frozen record
- Sealed
- 21 July 2026 by Priya Nair, Finance Director · version 1
- Record hash (SHA-256)
- 774dd1311369e2a2fe8abe8206328e7fa05aab1cd5d7aef8318a00e08cb2a038
- Engine receipt
rw_28504f0f_89a— runway@1.0.0 on core 1.1.0, seed 2202, 5,000 paths, input hash28504f0f- Data version
- Management accounts Jun-2026; bank 2026-07-01; quote Ridley v2
- Action selected
- Sign the Deansgate lease and the fixed-price fit-out contract; open September 2026
- Success criterion
- Group cash balance above £0 at every month end to 21 July 2027, with no emergency funding
- Named resolution source
- Northstar bank statements and management accounts, reviewed by Hartley & Co
- Resolution date
- 21 July 2027
Sealed fields: id, question, inputs, classifications, evidence, model, dataVersion, seed, probability, band, confidence, scenarioSelected, challenge, reviews, approval, action, successCriterion, resolutionSource, resolutionDate, engineReceipt. A correction creates version 2 naming version 1 as superseded; nothing in a frozen record is edited in place. Anyone holding the inputs and the seed can reproduce the engine receipt at lexun.co.uk/verify.
8. Monitoring plan
| Assumption | Expected range | Current | Warning / critical | Owner | Frequency | Valid until | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester ramp | £22,000/mo by month 5 | Opened 12 Sep — no data yet | below £14,000/mo at month 5 / below £8,000/mo at month 5 | Daniel Okafor | Monthly | 12 February 2027 | Not yet due |
| Additional running cost | £13,800 to £15,200/mo | £14,500/mo | above £15,200 / above £16,500 | Priya Nair | Monthly | 21 July 2027 | Within range |
| Leeds enquiries (cannibalisation) | 90 to 120/mo | 96/mo | below 85/mo / below 70/mo | Daniel Okafor | Monthly | 31 March 2027 | Within range |
Checkpoints: 21 October 2026 (first), then quarterly to the resolution date. At 21 July 2027 the owner is asked for the bank statements and management accounts named above; reality is compared with the frozen criterion; the outcome is recorded write-once; the forecast is Brier-scored against a naive baseline; and why reality differed is written in words — including which assumption mattered.
9. Decision timeline
| Date | State | Who | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 June 2026 | Draft | Priya Nair | Framed after the board asked for a second showroom option |
| 20 June 2026 | Evidence required | Priya Nair | Needs landlord heads of terms, fit-out quote, Leeds showroom revenue history |
| 2 July 2026 | Ready for analysis | Priya Nair | Fit-out quote and heads of terms received; facts verified |
| 3 July 2026 | Analysed | Priya Nair | Expected case, uplift case and five scenarios at seed 2202 |
| 10 July 2026 | Challenged | Elena Marsh | Challenge filed — ramp assumption and lease break flagged |
| 15 July 2026 | In review | Daniel Okafor | Installations capacity for a second region reviewed |
| 21 July 2026 | Approved | Tom Whitfield | Approved with two conditions |
| 21 July 2026 | Frozen | Priya Nair | Record sealed; outcome due 21 July 2027 |
| 21 July 2026 | Monitoring | system | Assumption monitor armed; first checkpoint 21 October 2026 |
10. Boundaries
This paper is decision intelligence, not financial, legal, tax or investment advice. The probability band is a statement about a released model on stated inputs; its known weaknesses are published: revenue follows a log-normal multiplicative step about the stated growth rate, costs grow at a fixed rate, committed amounts are exact, there is no seasonality and no correlation between revenue and cost shocks, and a sales ramp is modelled as fixed committed inflows. No accuracy percentage is claimed for the model until ten outcomes have resolved in its domain. Northstar Kitchens Ltd is a fictional company created to demonstrate the record; no real customer, person or forecast appears in this paper.
Generated from demonstration data by LEXUN · lexun.co.uk/board-report · CA Capital Limited, company number 10848369.